Venue: Bourges/Viersen Rooms - Town Hall
Contact: Gemma George; Senior Governance Officer
Items
| No. |
Item |
1. |
Apologies for Absence
|
2. |
Declarations of Interest
At this point Members must declare whether they have
a disclosable pecuniary interest, or
other interest, in any of the items on the agenda, unless it is
already entered in the register of members’ interests or is a
“pending notification “ that has been disclosed to the
Solicitor to the Council.
Members must also declare if they are subject to
their party group whip in relation to any items under
consideration.
|
3. |
Application for a Personal Licence - Mr Vakkas Ciftepala  PDF 95 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
AB
Meeting of the Licensing Act 2003
Sub-Committee
Held
at the Town Hall, Peterborough on 21 March 2014
RECORD OF DECISION
|
1. Apologies for
Absence
|
There were no apologies for
absence received.
|
|
2. Declarations of
Interest
|
There were no declarations of
interest.
|
|
3. Application
|
Personal Licence
|
|
3.1
|
Application
Reference
|
MAU : 068881
|
|
3.2
|
Sub-Committee
Members
|
Councillor Thacker
(Chairman)
Councillor Saltmarsh
Councillor Peach
|
|
3.3
|
Officers
|
Darren Dolby , Regulatory
Officer – Licensing
Nigel Joseph, Lawyer –
Legal Advisor to the Sub-Committee
Karen S Dunleavy, Governance
Officer – Clerk to the Sub-Committee
|
|
3.4
|
Applicant
|
Mr.Vakkas Ciftepala
|
|
3.5
|
Nature of
Application
|
Application Type
Personal Licence
Summary of Review Application
In accordance with Section 51
of the Licensing Act 2003, following the submission of an
application for a Personal Licence and following declaration of a
criminal conviction, an objection was received from the Responsible
Authority – the Constabulary. The Licensing Authority was
required to hold a hearing.
A summary of the issues raised
within the representations included:
- The applicant had
declared a criminal conviction and following an objection from the
constabulary, his application required reviewing.
|
|
3.6
|
Licensing Objective(s) under which representations were
made
|
3.7
1. The Prevention of Crime and Disorder
|
|
3.7
|
Parties/Representatives and
witnesses present
|
Applicant/Representative
Mr Vakkas Ciftepala, who
was present as the Applicant
Mr. Langford Smith, who presented
the case on behalf of the Applicant Mr.
Vakkas Ciftepala.
Responsible Authorities
PC Grahame Robinson, who was
present on behalf of Cambridgeshire Constabulary.
|
|
3.8
|
Pre-hearing
considerations and any decisions taken by the Sub-Committee
relating to ancillary matters
|
There were no pre-hearing
considerations or decisions taken by the sub-committee relating to
ancillary matters.
|
|
3.9
|
Oral representations
|
Applicant / Responsible Authority
Mr. Langford Smith addressed the
Sub-Committee. The key points raised during his address, and
following questions from the Sub-Committee were as
follows:
- The applicant wished
to withdraw his application and reapply at a time when his criminal
convictions would not be considered.
|
|
3.11
4.
Decision
|
As the applicant wished for his
application to be withdrawn, the Chairman declared the meeting
closed.
|
Chairman
1:30 – 1:37pm
|