The Group Manager
Construction, Compliance and Resilience introduced a report on Risk
Management, Business Continuity (BC) and the Strategic Risk
Register (SRR). Members were also
advised that the SRR had recently been approved by the Corporate
Management Team (CMT) on 19 March 2013.
The key points within the
report included:
- Completion of operational risk profile;
- Continuation of review and revision of Service and Corporate BC
plans;
- Quarterly review of Strategic (corporate) Risk Register by
CMT;
- Coordination of Strategic and Departmental Risk
Registers;
- Regular risk “conversations” within and between
services at all levels;
- Updates on Insite, web and
E-Learning;
- Strategic issues such as the introduction and embedding of Risk
Management and Business Continuity Management into procurement
processes, induction briefings and business plans.
-
The training delivered to Members at a recent All
Party Policy meeting, which was aimed to assist Members
understanding of the risk management process and expectations upon
officers;
- Mid May risk management register approval;
- Risk one - growth agenda was
reviewed at CMT and further measures were to be introduced in order
to reduce the risk level and apply the necessary resources in order
to monitor the progress;
- Risk six – Safeguarding – the recent Ofsted results had been included;
- Risk nine – Public Health had also been captured;
and
- Risk ten – the Strategic Partnership arrangements was
thought to be robust enough by Senior Officers
The
Group Manager Construction, Compliance and Resilience and the Head
of Corporate Services responded to comments and questions raised by
Members regarding the SRR. In summary,
the responses included:
- Although the Safeguarding SRR score of 15 had remained the same
as the previous year, CMT had proposed a number of actions in order
to reduce the risk level;
- CMT had focussed on introducing risk measures for the transfer
of health services from the Primary Care Trust (PCT) to the
Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), in order to ensure that the
loss of funding did not impact on the health needs of Peterborough.
Progress was also to be monitored by the Health and Wellbeing Board ongoing;
- Strategic Partnerships risk had been included on the register in
a more detailed way compared to the previous year’s register,
hence the reason for it being identified as a new risk;
- CMT was to monitor risks on a high level basis for contracts and
projects and lower level detail would not be included within the
SRR monitoring exercise;
- Any risk identified for income generation for growth projects
would be included on the SRR and closely monitored by CMT as
appropriate;
- Controls were set at a strategic level in order to monitor
contracts;
·
The Enterprise Peterborough contract
had been discussed, in detail, at a recent Sustainable Growth and
Environment Capital Scrutiny Committee.
The service Directors and the Cabinet Advisor to the Deputy Leader
was in attendance to answer questions and note actions in relation
to any contract issues raised; and
·
The Energy Park project would be
included on the SRR under risk eight, Financial Provision, in line
with the relevant financial year, in order to monitor the financial
balances.
ACTION
AGREED:
The Committee
considered and noted the contents of the report.
The
Committee Further Agreed:
That the Group Manager Construction, Compliance and Resilience
and Head of Corporate Service would communicate to CMT, the Audit
Committee’s comments and concerns raised regarding whether
the appropriate level of risk had been identified on the SRR for
the following:
- Growth and income generation based projects;
- The lack of funding for health service provision through
Peterborough City Hospital; and
- The Council’s Medium Term Financial Strategy (MFTS) and
whether the budget would balance in five years time.